Just over three quarters (76%) of advisers are worried about possible long-term compliance and regulatory challenges linked to robo-advice, while two out of three fear robo-advice solutions will not provide the best advice for clients, a nationwide survey has shown.

Prudential's survey showed that 40% of advisers are worried about their firms losing out to technological-based solutions and more than half (54%) say robo-advice is suitable only for clients with smaller funds.

However, adviser attitudes to robo-advice have changed in the past year, and 69% now believe technological-based solutions can help to close the advice gap. A similar study last year showed fewer than one in five (17%) believed robo-advice would help.

When it comes to launching their own versions of robo-advice over the coming year – 41% of advisers said they or their firm had plans to offer robo-advice solutions alongside traditional services.

Nearly half (46%) said offering robo-advice will help their business grow by enabling them to help clients with smaller funds compared, with just 27% who disagree.

Prudential’s business consultancy for advisers head Paul Harrison said: “Many advisers remain sceptical about the risks and rewards of robo-advice, although improved technology can bring greater efficiency, reduce costs and help advisers to serve clients better while continuing to run viable businesses.

“However, views are changing rapidly as technology expands. Advisers will need to adapt to prove the ongoing value of bespoke advice and benefit from the opportunities technology offers.”

Share Story: