FOS makes crucial decisions against SIPP provider Liberty Sipp

Following months of speculation, the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has issued landmark decisions against Liberty Sipp, the self-invested personal pension (SIPP) provider that has recently come under fire.

The ombudsman has given the same response in three preliminary decisions for clients of financial mis-selling solicitors Anthony Philip James & Co (APJ), with the three individuals investing a total of £36,200 into the Ethical Forestry scheme through Liberty Sipp.

The investments were made following the advice of introducer Avacade, which cold called the clients and recommended they transfer their pensions. The introducer made similar recommendations to thousands of other investors across the UK, resulting in millions of pounds of losses.

The FOS adjudicator has found that Liberty Sipp was in breach of its duty of care to clients because it should have been aware that “there was a high chance that a lot, if not all, of the business introduced by Avacade, would contain a high risk of significant consumer detriment”.

The adjudicator concluded that it was not “fair or reasonable for Liberty Sipp to have accepted the clients applications on the basis and manner proposed”.

Commenting, Anthony Philip James & Co financial mis-selling solicitor Glyn Taylor said: “We’re delighted that the FOS has recognised what we’ve been arguing for months, that Liberty Sipp had a responsibility to carry out due diligence on the business it accepted from Avacade and in failing to do this, and agreeing to accept such a large amount of questionable business from Avacade, it is liable for clients losses.”

The solicitors argued that the decisions could be a “watershed for the SIPP industry”, as they directly refute Liberty Sipp’s argument that they are not liable for victims’ losses as they accepted business on an execution only basis.

Furthermore, APJ have a further 500 similar cases lodged with the FOS against Liberty Sipp for clients, with a value totalling over £18m.

Due to the large volume of similar cases, Liberty Sipp could be facing a bill worth tens of millions to compensate the clients it has failed.

“We’re confident that the FOS will now issue similar decisions on behalf of many more of our other clients who have lost money after putting their trust in Avacade and Liberty Sipp,” Taylor added.

“Our concern now is that the hundred of victims we know of are only the tip of the iceberg. We’ve had more than 150 calls from people who have lost money after investing with Liberty Sipp in the last month alone. It’s terrible to hear how these people are struggling having been scammed and we urge anyone who has been affected to seek help so they can get the compensation they deserve.”

The adjudicator has deemed that Liberty Sipp should compensate the clients so that they are back in the position they would have been, had they not transferred their pensions, including any gains they would have made in their previous pensions, while also paying a nominal fee of £500 for the upset caused.

However, Liberty Sipp has the opportunity to appeal the preliminary decisions.

    Share Story:

Recent Stories


FREE E-NEWS SIGN UP

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive breaking news and other industry announcements by email.

  Please tick here to confirm you are happy to receive third party promotions from carefully selected partners.


NEW BUILD IN FOCUS - NEW EPISODE OF THE MORTGAGE INSIDER PODCAST, OUT NOW
Figures from the National House-Building Council saw Q1 2025 register a 36% increase in new homes built across the UK compared with the same period last year, representing a striking development for the first-time buyer market. But with the higher cost of building, ongoing planning challenges and new and changing regulations, how sustainable is this growth? And what does it mean for brokers?

The role of the bridging market and technology usage in the industry
Content editor, Dan McGrath, sat down with chief operating officer at Black & White Bridging, Damien Druce, and head of development finance at Empire Global Finance, Pete Williams, to explore the role of the bridging sector, the role of AI across the industry and how the property market has fared in the Labour Government’s first year in office.

Does the North-South divide still exist in the UK housing market?
What do the most expensive parts of the country reveal about shifting demand? And why is the Manchester housing market now outperforming many southern counterparts?



In this episode of the Barclays Mortgage Insider Podcast, host Phil Spencer is joined by Lucian Cook, Head of Research at Savills, and Ross Jones, founder of Home Financial and Evolve Commercial Finance, to explore how regional trends are redefining the UK housing, mortgage and buy-to-let markets.

The new episode of The Mortgage Insider podcast, out now
Regional housing markets now matter more than ever. While London and the Southeast still tend to dominate the headlines from a house price and affordability perspective, much of the growth in rental yields and buyer demand is coming from other parts of the UK.

In this episode of the Barclays Mortgage Insider Podcast, host Phil Spencer is joined by Lucian Cook, Head of Research at Savills, and Ross Jones, founder of Home Financial and Evolve Commercial Finance.